From: YourPal (dearprudence28@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Feb 24 2008 - 04:55:51 ARST
Hi Rookie,
Thanks for your reply.
If the task requires that only EIGRP is prohibited between the two routers,
I'm afraid protected port solution does not meet the requirement.
Thank you.
BR,
Emil
On 2/23/08, Rookie Ccie <rookie.ccie@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You can use protected ports to achieve your goal.
>
> Rgds
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:39 AM, YourPal <dearprudence28@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > I have this scenario.
> >
> > A Cat3550 has the following interfaces in VLAN 1363:
> >
> > Fa0/1 - To R1's Fa0/0
> > Fa0/3 - To R3's Fa0/0
> >
> > R1 and R3 run EIGRP on their Fa0/0 interfaces. I'd like to prevent them
> > from
> > forming neighbor with each other. Besides using VACL, the following
> > solution
> > seems to work:
> >
> > !
> > no ip igmp snooping vlan 1363
> > mac-address-table static 0100.5e00.000a vlan 1363 interface
> > FastEthernet0/24
> > !
> >
> > Where Fa0/24 is any unused/not connected port and 0100.5e00.000a is the
> > MAC
> > address of the EIGRP multicast address 224.0.0.10.
> >
> > However, the same solution applied to Cat3560 doesn't yield the same
> > result.
> > I have to configure an ACL on the ports to deny EIGRP packets.
> >
> > Anyone please help.
> >
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > BR,
> > Emil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:49 ARST