From: George Goglidze (goglidze@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 11 2007 - 06:32:56 ART
Hi There,
It actually took even less time then my calculations come up with:
35GB = 35000 mB, 280000 mb
280000/100 = 2800 seconds which are around 46 minutes.
So I guess it even took 3 minutes less then it should.
if there is no more traffic that's pretty fine.
man that's even faster then copying from one HDD to another.
to achieve 35 gB in 5 minute rate , you would need almost 1g line.
Also you would need to consider things like TCP global synchronization, and
if RED/WRED are in place.
On Dec 11, 2007 9:43 AM, Ali.Huang <zero5291@gmail.com> wrote:
> The ideal result is 35GB*1024*8/100Mbps$B!#(B
> 1Byte$B!a(B8bit
>
> On 12/11/07, itsfortarget iwillgetit <itsfortarget@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Group,
> >
> > Pls find a solution for this problem.
> >
> > I have two server connected to a 6509 Switch's Gigabit ethernet
> > Ports.Oneserver(old)'s Bandwidth is 100 Mbps.
> >
> > I have to copy data having size of 35 GB from Old to new ,Copying
> delayed so
> > much.
> >
> > *Suppose the data transfer takes place at 100 Mbps Because Old is
> working in
> > 100 Mbps.
> >
> > Then it should take* 5.973333333 *Minutes(ie 35 GB / 100 MB)
> >
> > *But it takes *43* Minutes.
> >
> > *Both NICs are full duplex
> >
> > *I have checked Auto negotiation.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
> --
> ALL THE BEST
> Ali Huang
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:30 ARST