From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Sat Nov 10 2007 - 01:46:08 ART
Thank you Brian! That lab was the 2nd best (13 is my favorite)... I was just
going to answer his question too...
We did a whole thing a while back here with running only gre tunnels across
a frame relay cloud between routers instead of broadcast keywords...
It evolved from ospf to multicast to ipv6...
Great product, sorry I had to say it again...
-Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Brian Dennis
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 9:08 PM
To: abderrahim sadki; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: lab 16 task 5.1-tunnel between hub and spoke
Did you meet the requirements of task 2.1 which indicated to not use the
broadcast keyword in your Frame Relay mappings?
Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>----- Original Message -----
Subject: lab 16 task 5.1-tunnel between hub and spoke
Date: Fri, November 9, 2007 17:35
From: "abderrahim sadki" <a_sadki1@hotmail.com>
> Hi all,
>
> for this task a tunnel has been set between the hub and spokes with
> sparse-mode.
> my question is simple, why not use ip pim nbma-mode instead of the tunnel?
>
> thanks,
> Abderrahim
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now!
> http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:29 ART