From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Sat Nov 10 2007 - 01:46:55 ART
OMG, LOL, ROFL
That would have been a long after noon in notepad in the lab (Freaking out)
-Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
abderrahim sadki
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 9:30 PM
To: bdennis@internetworkexpert.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: lab 16 task 5.1-tunnel between hub and spoke
yes I missed that..
thanks!
> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 20:07:51 -0600
> Subject: Re: lab 16 task 5.1-tunnel between hub and spoke
> From: bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> To: a_sadki1@hotmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> Did you meet the requirements of task 2.1 which indicated to not use the
> broadcast keyword in your Frame Relay mappings?
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
>
> >----- Original Message -----
> Subject: lab 16 task 5.1-tunnel between hub and spoke
> Date: Fri, November 9, 2007 17:35
> From: "abderrahim sadki" <a_sadki1@hotmail.com>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > for this task a tunnel has been set between the hub and spokes with
> > sparse-mode.
> > my question is simple, why not use ip pim nbma-mode instead of the
tunnel?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Abderrahim
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it
now!
> > http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:29 ART