From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Fri Oct 12 2007 - 11:23:34 ART
Adjacencies of IGPs are done with link-local addresses (debug ipv6 packet
and watch the source address). So you need to pay attention to them.
The link-local's are defined. It's not a necessity, but when it comes to
typing all the map commands and/or pings and stuff, it's a hell of a lot
easier to type in FE80::1 than looking up/copying/pasting/typing the EUI-64
version of the automatic address.
So it's simply a time saver. Not required, just a choice.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
smorris@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
George Goglidze
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:03 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: IPV6 +link-local address
Hello all,
I'm doing ipexpert lab 11, advanced ipv6 routing.
It's about ospfv3 and mpbgp for ipv6.
I can see in answers of ipexpert, they use link-local addresses almost
everywhere, on all fastethernet and Serial interfaces, and in some cases I
really think it's not neccessary.
On fastethernet interfaces why don't they just make neighbor adjacencies
with normal unicast ipv6 addresses?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:14 ART