Re: SIP/SPA bug ???

From: mam phuquoc (mamphuquoc@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:19:53 ART


Ok, so cisco recommended using just the priority command, then police the
traffic and apply the policy, it seems to work for SIP/SPA with gig
interface.

policy-map core-egress
  class VoIP_RTP
    priority
   police cir 100000000 bc 3125000 be 3125000 conform-action transmit
exceed-act
ion drop violate-action drop
  class Video_Payload
    bandwidth 50000
  class Scavenger
    bandwidth 256
policy-map sonet-shape
  class class-default
    shape average 300000000
   service-policy core-egress

I wonder, if you police the priority queue, that would still carve up the
buffer to allow the specified traffic to pass through, but I always thought
police is more for congestion avoidance, not congestion management.

On 8/18/07, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi MAM,
> A couple of months ago I have been through the same situation as you.
> It is only supported if you have supported WAN interface module. For
> example ATM module.
>
> Any ethernet blade doesn't have this feature on 65xx series.
>
> Frog



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:12 ART