From: Derek Pocoroba (dpocoroba@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Aug 09 2007 - 16:51:57 ART
With regards to over configuration. The only thing I was asked to remove
that could be considered "extra" was any custom macros, alias commands and
make sure all the TCL scripts were stopped.
-Derek
18559
On 8/9/07, Peter Kingston <kingstonp.ccie@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Hopefully I am not asking to much here.
>
> I was wondering if anyone had and Idea about losing points for extra
> configuration?
>
> Say for example you add a route-reflector-client on a neighbor that didn't
> need it.
>
> Or maybe a Next-hop-self on a neighbor that isn't requested of it
>
> Will this lose you points? and where would the points be lost if you did
> the
> above.
> Could you lose points on all bgp section by adding this extra
> configuration?
>
> Is this a proctor question? does there need to be a more direct example?
>
> Second question:
>
> In a route-map, redistributing connected into BGP
>
> match interface loopback0
>
> compared to
>
> match ip address prefix-list loopback0
>
> ip prefix-list loopback0 permit <loopback network>
>
> They generate the same output, is there a preference?
>
> Another proctor question?
>
> Should you mark yourself wrong if the practice labs that you are doing
> says
> a different method than you have implemented? or be lenient on yourself?
>
> Just my general thoughts, anyones input is welcome.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Peter Kingston
> Studying my CCIE
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:10 ART