From: Peter Kingston (kingstonp.ccie@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 10 2007 - 07:20:38 ART
thanks heaps for your responses, it helps.
On 8/10/07, Derek Pocoroba <dpocoroba@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With regards to over configuration. The only thing I was asked to remove
> that could be considered "extra" was any custom macros, alias commands and
> make sure all the TCL scripts were stopped.
>
>
> -Derek
> 18559
>
> On 8/9/07, Peter Kingston <kingstonp.ccie@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Hopefully I am not asking to much here.
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone had and Idea about losing points for extra
> > configuration?
> >
> > Say for example you add a route-reflector-client on a neighbor that
> > didn't
> > need it.
> >
> > Or maybe a Next-hop-self on a neighbor that isn't requested of it
> >
> > Will this lose you points? and where would the points be lost if you did
> > the
> > above.
> > Could you lose points on all bgp section by adding this extra
> > configuration?
> >
> > Is this a proctor question? does there need to be a more direct example?
> >
> > Second question:
> >
> > In a route-map, redistributing connected into BGP
> >
> > match interface loopback0
> >
> > compared to
> >
> > match ip address prefix-list loopback0
> >
> > ip prefix-list loopback0 permit <loopback network>
> >
> > They generate the same output, is there a preference?
> >
> > Another proctor question?
> >
> > Should you mark yourself wrong if the practice labs that you are doing
> > says
> > a different method than you have implemented? or be lenient on yourself?
> >
> > Just my general thoughts, anyones input is welcome.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Peter Kingston
> > Studying my CCIE
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
-- Regards,Peter Kingston Studying my CCIE
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:10 ART