From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Thu Aug 09 2007 - 01:02:58 ART
Now, now, let's be a little more pleasant.
I'm sure that the more we learn about how entire systems and global load
balancers work, the more appropriately we'd be able to answer that question
ourselves without appearing like too much of an ass.
Sometimes, in the grand scheme of things, sh#$ happens. I'm sure whatever
horrible crime that someone committed there is being paid for internally.
Perhaps we'll see pictures of the public execution posted on Cisco's news
blog website.
Short of that, until you have all the facts and can make a better design
yourself (and perhaps be a touch more constructive in the criticism) then I
would think it safer to remain quiet.
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
smorris@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
scotteza@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 8:40 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: OT: Is Cisco.com down - Larry Letterman
Larry,
why are you taking mediocrity to a whole new level.
who cares if only K was down. As far as the end user was concern, end-to-end
connectivity was lost.
How on earth can one data center failure cause the entire website to go
down? ?????
Its either those in your IT group lack the competence in designing a fully
redundant network or Cisco itself does not trust its solution, hence your IT
group is skeptical about implementing the redundant soltions that you sell
everyday.
Scot Teza
Juniper for life !
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:10 ART