From: Salau, Yemi (yemi.salau@siemens.com)
Date: Tue Jun 19 2007 - 06:35:01 ART
You're certainly right my friend, I agree with you. Like I said in my
previous mail, "why not bounce"; it's just an option to fulfil Hank's
not having to reload the router. I cant stick my neck 100% for this
bouncing method, I remember using it once in the lab, went to launch and
came back to still see those dreaded 0.0.0.0 in my frame-relay maps.
Can't really say what happened but at the end of the day, had to reload
and kept checking the frame-relay maps until leaving the lab room
Just another option in the bag mate.
Many Thanks
Yemi Salau
________________________________
From: Hash Aminu [mailto:hashng@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 June 2007 10:06
To: Salau, Yemi
Cc: henkbotha@hotmail.com; Sadiq Yakasai; CCIE SG
Subject: Re: Frame-Relay inarp
Henk,
This topic has been a topic of discussion sometime ago on the GS.
The idea he is that some will tell you that you should bounce the
interface, or clear frame-relay inarp, my experience with these is that
sometime it works and sometimes not, the best way to be sure is to
reload the router.
HTH
hash
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:49 ART