From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Tue Jun 12 2007 - 21:27:10 ART
Considering that MSDP was originally designed as Inter-AS Multicast
operation, I'd say yeah, there's NOT any requirement to have Anycast be part
of the equation.
You can run MSDP between any two RP's that leave you in a situation where
one doesn't know about the other's groups/registration messages.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
smorris@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of CCIE
GOAL
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 6:22 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Anycast-RP + AutoRP
Hi group,
I was playing a little with multicast and a doubt came up regarding
anycast...
I saw that anycast is able to load-balance... the source joins the nearest
RP....
But is there any option to force the RP to always be the same router, and
only if there is some problem with this RP router the msdp peer should take
over?
I know that it is possible without Anycast.
But I would like to know on a "Anycast + Auto-RP" scenario...
Thanks in advance!
Luciano
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:48 ART