From: Marko Milivojevic (markom@vodafone.is)
Date: Tue Jun 12 2007 - 21:26:51 ART
Hm, that would sort of defeat the purpose of anycast solution which is to
load share.
However, I suppose it could be done by heavily manipulating metrics from the
"secondary" router, making sure that the other one is always closer. It
would still not work for directly attached neighbors.
> From: CCIE GOAL <ccie.goal@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: CCIE GOAL <ccie.goal@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:22:23 -0300
> To: Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Anycast-RP + AutoRP
>
> Hi group,
>
> I was playing a little with multicast and a doubt came up regarding anycast...
>
> I saw that anycast is able to load-balance... the source joins the
> nearest RP....
>
> But is there any option to force the RP to always be the same router,
> and only if there is some problem with this RP router the msdp peer
> should take over?
>
> I know that it is possible without Anycast.
> But I would like to know on a "Anycast + Auto-RP" scenario...
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Luciano
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:48 ART