From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Tue May 29 2007 - 21:04:00 ART
Yup, keeps things nice and simple!
I wasted too many brain cells in college, so I try to find any way possible
to preserve what I have these days. ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Rob
McDonald
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 6:36 PM
To: smorris@ipexpert.com
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: IPv6
Thanks for the reply...
So the recommendation is to force all the interfaces on the same router to
have the same link-local address. For example:
R1#
int s0/0/0
ipv6 add FE80::1 link-local
int fa0/0
ipv6 add FE80::1 link-local
int fa0/1
ipv6 add FE80::1 link-local
Thanks,
Rob
On 5/29/07, Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
>
> Absolutely. The address IS link-local after all.
>
> I recommend using FE80::1 for R1, FE80::2 for R2, etc. Make your life
> easier!
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> JNCIE #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of Rob McDonald
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 1:42 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: IPv6
>
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible for 2 interfaces eg. (Fa0/0 & S0/0/0) have the same
> link local address? If it's allowed..... is there any drawback for having
this?
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:22 ART