From: Derek Pocoroba (dpocoroba@gmail.com)
Date: Tue May 29 2007 - 20:02:15 ART
I personally try and include the VLAN/subnet as well. Makes it nice and
easy to identify addresses
EX:
R1 VLAN 45
FE80:45::1 link-local
R2 VLAN 67
FE80:67::2 link-local
On 5/29/07, Rob McDonald <robmexpert@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply...
>
> So the recommendation is to force all the interfaces on the same router to
> have the same link-local address. For example:
>
> R1#
> int s0/0/0
> ipv6 add FE80::1 link-local
>
> int fa0/0
> ipv6 add FE80::1 link-local
>
> int fa0/1
> ipv6 add FE80::1 link-local
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
>
>
> On 5/29/07, Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
> >
> > Absolutely. The address IS link-local after all.
> >
> > I recommend using FE80::1 for R1, FE80::2 for R2, etc. Make your life
> > easier!
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> JNCIE
> > #153, CISSP, et al.
> > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
> > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > smorris@ipexpert.com
> > http://www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Rob
> > McDonald
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 1:42 AM
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: IPv6
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is it possible for 2 interfaces eg. (Fa0/0 & S0/0/0) have the same link
> > local address? If it's allowed..... is there any drawback for having
> this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rob
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:22 ART