From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Sun May 27 2007 - 14:22:01 ART
Once the routes are learned via BGP, they are deleted from the RIP
database. Shutdown the BGP neighbor with the neighbor shutdown command and
allow the RIP routes to be added. Then debug ip rip database and no shut
your neighbor. You will see the metric for the RIP routes set to
4294967295, the max value, and they are deleted from the database.
On 5/27/07, Bhaskar Sivanesan <bas_bharath@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi group
>
> I have scenario the following scenario
> SW2<--->BB2. RIP and eBGP are running between the two boxes.
>
> Initially,SW2 learned the 3 prefixes(204.1.1.0,204.2.2.0,204.3.33.0) from
> BB2 via RIP. Later eBGP is enabled between the routers AND SW2 preferred teh
> BGP update ove the RIP date. So far is fine.
> But when I looked into rip database in SW2, the prefixes are removed from
> it as well. I feel the prefix should be present in both BGP and rip database
> and due the AD only BGP entry is entered into the routing table. Why is the
> prefix also removed from the RIP database although it keeps receiving the
> update for those prefixes.
>
> cheers
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________You
> snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck
> in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_html.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Ronald Angello CCIE #17846
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:22 ART