From: Mihai Mincu (mincu_mihai@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun May 27 2007 - 18:27:56 ART
Hi Bhaskar!
The RIP database holds only the RIP routes that are
currently used by the router (that means installed in
the routing table).
Once the RIP networks are replaced in the routing
table with the eBGP entries (that have lower AD), they
will be also taken out of the RIP database. This is
RIP's normal behavior.
Hope this helps,
Mihai
--- Bhaskar Sivanesan <bas_bharath@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi group
>
> I have scenario the following scenario
> SW2<--->BB2. RIP and eBGP are running between the
> two boxes.
>
> Initially,SW2 learned the 3
> prefixes(204.1.1.0,204.2.2.0,204.3.33.0) from BB2
> via RIP. Later eBGP is enabled between the routers
> AND SW2 preferred teh BGP update ove the RIP date.
> So far is fine.
> But when I looked into rip database in SW2, the
> prefixes are removed from it as well. I feel the
> prefix should be present in both BGP and rip
> database and due the AD only BGP entry is entered
> into the routing table. Why is the prefix also
> removed from the RIP database although it keeps
> receiving the update for those prefixes.
>
> cheers
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:22 ART