RIP and BGP

From: Bhaskar Sivanesan (bas_bharath@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun May 27 2007 - 13:29:20 ART

• Next message: Tarun Pahuja: "Re: Purpose of client-name in DHCP pool"
• Previous message: Cacca Mucca: "Re: Can my company use my ccie for their partnet contract"
• Next in thread: Ronnie Angello: "Re: RIP and BGP"
• Maybe reply: Ronnie Angello: "Re: RIP and BGP"
• Maybe reply: Mihai Mincu: "Re: RIP and BGP"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi group

 I have scenario the following scenario
SW2<--->BB2. RIP and eBGP are running between the two boxes.
 
Initially,SW2 learned the 3 prefixes(204.1.1.0,204.2.2.0,204.3.33.0) from BB2 via RIP. Later eBGP is enabled between the routers AND SW2 preferred teh BGP update ove the RIP date. So far is fine.
But when I looked into rip database in SW2, the prefixes are removed from it as well. I feel the prefix should be present in both BGP and rip database and due the AD only BGP entry is entered into the routing table. Why is the prefix also removed from the RIP database although it keeps receiving the update for those prefixes.

cheers

• Next message: Tarun Pahuja: "Re: Purpose of client-name in DHCP pool"
• Previous message: Cacca Mucca: "Re: Can my company use my ccie for their partnet contract"
• Next in thread: Ronnie Angello: "Re: RIP and BGP"
• Maybe reply: Ronnie Angello: "Re: RIP and BGP"
• Maybe reply: Mihai Mincu: "Re: RIP and BGP"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:22 ART