From: Prathap C (csprathap@gmail.com)
Date: Thu May 10 2007 - 09:43:08 ART
Hi,
Plz confirm us the ip address and subnet mask.
On 5/10/07, Guyler, Rik <rguyler@shp-dayton.org> wrote:
> Chris, why don't you post the configs of the interfaces (physical and subs).
> That's always helpful, especially when you don't get any "I've seen that
> before" responses.
>
> Rik
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Chris Riling
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 12:41 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Dumb Trunking Question
>
> Sorry for the CCNA level question, but I'm tired and I'm sure it happens to
> all of us at some point... Office number 1 has an 1811 with integrated 8
> port switch; Office 2 has an 871. There is a dot1q trunk between fa3 on the
> 871, and fa2 on the 1811. Both have SVI's for VLAN1 with IP's assigned in
> the same /24 (192.168.1.0/24). There is also a VLAN 100 existing on both
> routers, with an SVI on each, which is part of the same /29. Both VLANs are
> allowed from each side of the trunk, and when I just do the normal
> "switchport trunk encap dot1q" and "switchport mode trunk" on each end, I
> can't ping across the trunk to either SVI. If I set the native VLAN to 100
> on each end, I can ping the SVI's and machines on VLAN 100, but I still
> can't ping the SVI's on VLAN 1... any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Prathap.C
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:20 ART