From: Mounir Mohamed (mounir.mohamed@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Apr 30 2007 - 04:50:22 ART
Sorry i get Confused by the subject
On 4/30/07, Gavin Lawson <GavinL@titan.net.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Mounir
>
> Jeff said he only enabled EIGRP on a specific interface by using
> "network a.b.c.d 0.0.0.0".
>
> Jeff. It does look like you were robbed of the marks "Assuming there
> wasn't anything else that you violated by doing it this way?
>
> GL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Mounir Mohamed
> Sent: Monday, 30 April 2007 3:09 PM
> To: Jeff Mullan
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: EIGRP 0.0.0.0 vs Passive Interface
>
> 0.0.0.0 just to enable EIGRP on all interfaces regradless the address
> class belong to, passive default do disable hello packet from send out
> all interfaces, no passive interface to allow only specific interface to
> send and receive hellow packets which result in EI|GRP adjecency through
> such interface.
>
> Best Regards,
> Mounir Mohamed
>
>
> On 4/30/07, Jeff Mullan <jmullan78@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> > I just lost some points on one of these mock labs on EIGRP. The task
> > wanted to run EIGRP only on the interface in question. Hence, I did a
> > network "
> > a.b.c.d 0.0.0.0". The solution, along with this also had a passive
> > interface default + no passive interface "this interface". I dont see
> > a reason why we would need the passive command considering I am using
> > 0.0.0.0. Any thoughts ?
> > Thanks,
> > JM
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Reagrds,
> Mounir Mohamed
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Best Reagrds, Mounir Mohamed
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:38 ART