RE: EIGRP 0.0.0.0 vs Passive Interface

From: Gavin Lawson (GavinL@titan.net.au)
Date: Mon Apr 30 2007 - 04:28:18 ART


Hi Mounir

Jeff said he only enabled EIGRP on a specific interface by using
"network a.b.c.d 0.0.0.0".

Jeff. It does look like you were robbed of the marks "Assuming there
wasn't anything else that you violated by doing it this way?

GL

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Mounir Mohamed
Sent: Monday, 30 April 2007 3:09 PM
To: Jeff Mullan
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: EIGRP 0.0.0.0 vs Passive Interface

0.0.0.0 just to enable EIGRP on all interfaces regradless the address
class belong to, passive default do disable hello packet from send out
all interfaces, no passive interface to allow only specific interface to
send and receive hellow packets which result in EI|GRP adjecency through
such interface.

Best Regards,
Mounir Mohamed

On 4/30/07, Jeff Mullan <jmullan78@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Folks,
> I just lost some points on one of these mock labs on EIGRP. The task
> wanted to run EIGRP only on the interface in question. Hence, I did a
> network "
> a.b.c.d 0.0.0.0". The solution, along with this also had a passive
> interface default + no passive interface "this interface". I dont see
> a reason why we would need the passive command considering I am using
> 0.0.0.0. Any thoughts ?
> Thanks,
> JM
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>

--
Best Reagrds,
Mounir Mohamed


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:38 ART