From: Todd, Douglas M. (DTODD@PARTNERS.ORG)
Date: Mon Apr 30 2007 - 11:02:34 ART
All:
Reviewing my past notes this seems to be common when asked such a question. Even
if you enable the process on the interface by
a.b.c.d 0.0.0.0 the solution commonly includes passive-int default and then a no
passive int x/y. I believe this is to
make you do something all the time no matter what protocol you are running
(especially when running rip).
1) When going through the solutions I always keep in mind that there is more
than one way to provide the solution.
2) You can not ask a proctor in the mock labs
3) In the real lab I would ask the proctor
a) I can do a network a.b.c.d 0.0.0.0 which gives the right solution
b) I can safe guard the solution by adding the passive-interface default
and then a no passive on the interface
4) If you feel you have solved the problem with a different method then you
should get the points...
I have similar concerns when going through the solutions, but I have gotten into
the mind set of doing a passive default and then
a no passive. AS long as the task does not state you can not do this
command....
Douglas
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Mounir
Mohamed
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 3:50 AM
To: Gavin Lawson
Cc: Jeff Mullan; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: EIGRP 0.0.0.0 vs Passive Interface
Sorry i get Confused by the subject
On 4/30/07, Gavin Lawson <GavinL@titan.net.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Mounir
>
> Jeff said he only enabled EIGRP on a specific interface by using
> "network a.b.c.d 0.0.0.0".
>
> Jeff. It does look like you were robbed of the marks "Assuming there
> wasn't anything else that you violated by doing it this way?
>
> GL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of Mounir Mohamed
> Sent: Monday, 30 April 2007 3:09 PM
> To: Jeff Mullan
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: EIGRP 0.0.0.0 vs Passive Interface
>
> 0.0.0.0 just to enable EIGRP on all interfaces regradless the address
> class belong to, passive default do disable hello packet from send out
> all interfaces, no passive interface to allow only specific interface
> to send and receive hellow packets which result in EI|GRP adjecency
> through such interface.
>
> Best Regards,
> Mounir Mohamed
>
>
> On 4/30/07, Jeff Mullan <jmullan78@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> > I just lost some points on one of these mock labs on EIGRP. The task
> > wanted to run EIGRP only on the interface in question. Hence, I did
> > a network "
> > a.b.c.d 0.0.0.0". The solution, along with this also had a passive
> > interface default + no passive interface "this interface". I dont
> > see a reason why we would need the passive command considering I am
> > using 0.0.0.0. Any thoughts ?
> > Thanks,
> > JM
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > __ _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Reagrds,
> Mounir Mohamed
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Best Reagrds, Mounir Mohamed
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:38 ART