RE: regrading

From: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com
Date: Fri Feb 23 2007 - 11:50:38 ART


I do remember it happening to me once as well...I felt great about that
section (Multicast) and saw the goose egg. I have just been assuming
ever since that I did misinterpret a key task.

I wonder if this is an area where the grading script looks for a
specific configuration - and it is not until a human really looks
closely that our working configuration is acceptable.

I am just thinking about RP "assignment" as an example...there are many
ways to get it done - and if Cisco is not explicit with the method we
need...

If I were preparing right now for the Lab Exam - I would definitely
pre-plan to ask the proctors some detailed questions if anything is hazy
in this section.

Anthony J. Sequeira
#15626

P.S. I think we also have to face the fact here that for many of us that
are reporting the 0% - there is a good percentage of us (me :-)), that
really did completely mess up the section!

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Joe Yohannan
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 8:34 AM
To: alextols@gmail.com; deji500@hotmail.com
Cc: swm@emanon.com; narbikk@gmail.com; louisccie_r_s@yahoo.com;
bit.gossip@chello.nl; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: regrading

That is interesting to hear. I'm in the same boat as Deji. I got 0% on

multicast and I feel it was 100%. I read the questions over and
verified
several times. It was right.

- Joe Yo

>From: Blastmor <alextols@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: Blastmor <alextols@gmail.com>
>To: "Deji Steve-Fagbemi" <deji500@hotmail.com>
>CC: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>, "Narbik Kocharians"
><narbikk@gmail.com>, "Lou Ioanni" <louisccie_r_s@yahoo.com>,

>BitGossip <bit.gossip@chello.nl>, "Cisco certification"
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: regrading
>Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:20:07 +0300
>
>Everyone I know who tried to pass recently and got 0% in multicast
after
>regrading got points (even 100% for section)
>
>2007/2/23, Deji Steve-Fagbemi <deji500@hotmail.com>:
> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > Is that not saying something about the process of grading the CCIE
lab?
>It
> > means that there is no consistency. If you got points that you
didn't
>have
> > originally and you lost points that you had originally, then the
process
> > of
> > grading labs requires some analysis.
> >
> > I had my first attempt last month and I got 0% for multicast and I
am
> > almost
> > certain that I completed both tasks in my multicast. Do they use
>computers
> > to grade? If so, how can a computer grade accurately?
> >
> > If you do not get detailed score reports then how can you challenge
your
> > score if you feel you have passed?
> > At least if you are at University and you feel that you didn't do as

>well
> > as
> > you hoped, you can apply to the exam board and get some other tutor
to
> > regrade.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> > Scott Morris
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 9:02 PM
> > To: 'Narbik Kocharians'
> > Cc: 'Blastmor'; 'Lou Ioanni'; 'BitGossip'; 'Cisco certification'
> > Subject: RE: regrading
> >
> > Nope, but I got back the points I was irritated for not getting.
But I
> > lost
> > some other points which kinda pissed me off. But I passed the next
>time,
> > so
> > it wasn't the end of the world.
> >
> > ;)
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Narbik Kocharians [mailto:narbikk@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:55 PM
> > To: Scott Morris
> > Cc: Blastmor; Lou Ioanni; BitGossip; Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: regrading
> >
> >
> > Scott, Did you pass after the regrade?
> >
> >
> > On 2/22/07, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> >
> > I did not get that on my regrade, but that was also three years
ago...
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Blastmor [mailto: alextols@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:39 PM
> > To: Scott Morris
> > Cc: Lou Ioanni; BitGossip; Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: regrading
> >
> >
> > You will receive table with was/now points on each section
> >
> >
> > 2007/2/22, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com>:
> >
> > You will get a score report, just like the first time around. And
you
>MAY
> > see differences in the values.
> >
> > You will not, however, get any detailed feedback or specific
listings of
> > what you missed.
> >
> > The score report is only meant to let you know 'areas' that you may
need
> > additional work in, not give you details.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>JNCIE
> > #153, CISSP, et al.
> > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
> > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > smorris@ipexpert.com
> > http://www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> > Lou
> > Ioanni
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:08 PM
> > To: BitGossip; Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: regrading
> >
> > I do not think so. If you fail you will see the percentages of your
>score
> > in
> > all areas tested, but if you regrade (you will pay for that) then
they
> > will
> > just let you know if you passed or failed (as far as I know).
> >
> >
> > Loizos Y.
> > CCIE#10702 R & S
> >
> > BitGossip <bit.gossip@chello.nl> wrote:
> > Group,
> >
> > In case I ask to regrade my lab is it possible that they tell you
what I
> > did
> >
> > wrong?
> >
> > I think it will be very useful to know that because I really can't
>figure
> > out myself what I did wrong and I don't want to do it again next
time.
> >
> > Luca.
> >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:48 ART