From: CharlesB (cbalik@adelphia.net)
Date: Fri Feb 23 2007 - 14:36:51 ART
I also think that Cisco should reimburse the regrading fee, if there is any
change in the scoring not only if it only changes pass or fail status.
The reason is that I believe it shows their reading mistake no matter what
the outcome is.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
anthony.sequeira@thomson.com
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 6:51 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: regrading
I do remember it happening to me once as well...I felt great about that
section (Multicast) and saw the goose egg. I have just been assuming ever
since that I did misinterpret a key task.
I wonder if this is an area where the grading script looks for a specific
configuration - and it is not until a human really looks closely that our
working configuration is acceptable.
I am just thinking about RP "assignment" as an example...there are many ways
to get it done - and if Cisco is not explicit with the method we need...
If I were preparing right now for the Lab Exam - I would definitely pre-plan
to ask the proctors some detailed questions if anything is hazy in this
section.
Anthony J. Sequeira
#15626
P.S. I think we also have to face the fact here that for many of us that are
reporting the 0% - there is a good percentage of us (me :-)), that really
did completely mess up the section!
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Joe
Yohannan
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 8:34 AM
To: alextols@gmail.com; deji500@hotmail.com
Cc: swm@emanon.com; narbikk@gmail.com; louisccie_r_s@yahoo.com;
bit.gossip@chello.nl; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: regrading
That is interesting to hear. I'm in the same boat as Deji. I got 0% on
multicast and I feel it was 100%. I read the questions over and verified
several times. It was right.
- Joe Yo
>From: Blastmor <alextols@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: Blastmor <alextols@gmail.com>
>To: "Deji Steve-Fagbemi" <deji500@hotmail.com>
>CC: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>, "Narbik Kocharians"
><narbikk@gmail.com>, "Lou Ioanni" <louisccie_r_s@yahoo.com>,
>BitGossip <bit.gossip@chello.nl>, "Cisco certification"
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: regrading
>Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:20:07 +0300
>
>Everyone I know who tried to pass recently and got 0% in multicast
after
>regrading got points (even 100% for section)
>
>2007/2/23, Deji Steve-Fagbemi <deji500@hotmail.com>:
> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > Is that not saying something about the process of grading the CCIE
lab?
>It
> > means that there is no consistency. If you got points that you
didn't
>have
> > originally and you lost points that you had originally, then the
process
> > of
> > grading labs requires some analysis.
> >
> > I had my first attempt last month and I got 0% for multicast and I
am
> > almost
> > certain that I completed both tasks in my multicast. Do they use
>computers
> > to grade? If so, how can a computer grade accurately?
> >
> > If you do not get detailed score reports then how can you challenge
your
> > score if you feel you have passed?
> > At least if you are at University and you feel that you didn't do as
>well
> > as
> > you hoped, you can apply to the exam board and get some other tutor
to
> > regrade.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> > Scott Morris
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 9:02 PM
> > To: 'Narbik Kocharians'
> > Cc: 'Blastmor'; 'Lou Ioanni'; 'BitGossip'; 'Cisco certification'
> > Subject: RE: regrading
> >
> > Nope, but I got back the points I was irritated for not getting.
But I
> > lost
> > some other points which kinda pissed me off. But I passed the next
>time,
> > so
> > it wasn't the end of the world.
> >
> > ;)
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Narbik Kocharians [mailto:narbikk@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:55 PM
> > To: Scott Morris
> > Cc: Blastmor; Lou Ioanni; BitGossip; Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: regrading
> >
> >
> > Scott, Did you pass after the regrade?
> >
> >
> > On 2/22/07, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> >
> > I did not get that on my regrade, but that was also three years
ago...
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Blastmor [mailto: alextols@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:39 PM
> > To: Scott Morris
> > Cc: Lou Ioanni; BitGossip; Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: regrading
> >
> >
> > You will receive table with was/now points on each section
> >
> >
> > 2007/2/22, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com>:
> >
> > You will get a score report, just like the first time around. And
you
>MAY
> > see differences in the values.
> >
> > You will not, however, get any detailed feedback or specific
listings of
> > what you missed.
> >
> > The score report is only meant to let you know 'areas' that you may
need
> > additional work in, not give you details.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>JNCIE
> > #153, CISSP, et al.
> > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
> > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > smorris@ipexpert.com
> > http://www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> > Lou
> > Ioanni
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:08 PM
> > To: BitGossip; Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: regrading
> >
> > I do not think so. If you fail you will see the percentages of your
>score
> > in
> > all areas tested, but if you regrade (you will pay for that) then
they
> > will
> > just let you know if you passed or failed (as far as I know).
> >
> >
> > Loizos Y.
> > CCIE#10702 R & S
> >
> > BitGossip <bit.gossip@chello.nl> wrote:
> > Group,
> >
> > In case I ask to regrade my lab is it possible that they tell you
what I
> > did
> >
> > wrong?
> >
> > I think it will be very useful to know that because I really can't
>figure
> > out myself what I did wrong and I don't want to do it again next
time.
> >
> > Luca.
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:48 ART