From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Feb 19 2007 - 22:20:55 ART
And wasn't it like tag teaming a rack with any notes
one might have acquired along the way...
(Kind of like a gladiator in the Roman Arena tied to
another gladiator fighting a large lion)
Or something like that - but then back in the day, I
do not recall most people being into sniffers and
running a lot of debug commands.
I would think CCIE lab candidates back in the day were
the possible exception along with Laura Chappell.
:)
--- Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
wrote:
> When I took the lab over 10 years ago they only had
> hubs.
>
> <CCO 1996>
> The CCIE Candidate will be presented with a complex
> design to implement from
> the physical layer, through logical configuration.
> Candidates are not
> required to configure any end-user systems, but are
> responsible for any
> device residing in the internetwork, including hubs,
> MAUs, DSU/CSU, etc.
> Network specifics, point values and testing criteria
> used to assess
> correctness of the individual configurations are
> provided.
> </CCO 1996>
>
>
http://web.archive.org/web/19961220172335/www.cisco.com/warp/public/331/1.sh
> tml
>
> --
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
>
>
>
> On 2/19/07 4:11 PM, "Narbik Kocharians"
> <narbikk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Marvin,
> > I heard that those days they only needed one or
> two commands for switching and
> > the command summary book was like 50 pages, and if
> they didnt remember the
> > commands the proctor would play a "sounds like"
> game hoping that they would
> > remember.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/19/07, Marvin Greenlee <marvin@ipexpert.com>
> wrote:
> >> So, by your "method", someone who had a lower
> CCIE number (under 16k), but
> >> recently achieved a second (or third) CCIE using
> materials from a vendor
> >> (like IPexpert) doesn't count as a "success
> story" for that vendor, because
> >> their number is lower?
> >>
> >> Marvin Greenlee, CCIE #12237 (R&S, SP, Sec)
> >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> >> "When Will You Be an IP Expert?"
> >> marvin@ipexpert.com
> >> http://www.IPexpert.com
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Brian Dennis
> >> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 6:21 PM
> >> To: jennytan
> >> Cc: Brian McGahan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> Subject: Re: chap auth over frame relay
> >>
> >> Actually there wouldn9t be a 3longer discussion2
> if you know how to answer
> >> the question yourself ;-) Just go to each
> vendor9s website and execute the
> >> command below. Then compare the output from each
> vendor. It should help
> >> answer your question ;-)
> >>
> >> www.someothervendor.com
> <http://www.someothervendor.com> >show ccie numbers
> |
> >> include recent R&S
> >>
> >> #17439
> >> #17409
> >> #17403
> >> #17401
> >> #17381
> >> #17372
> >>
> >>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:47 ART