Re: chap auth over frame relay

From: Brad Ellis (brad@ccbootcamp.com)
Date: Mon Feb 19 2007 - 21:35:51 ART


Let's see what happens when we issue the >correct< command on the latest
12.4 IOS...

www.ccbootcamp.com#show best boot camp

NLI has been offering CCIE training since 1998. There's no other company in
the world that has been "doing the CCIE thang" this long. We've got about
half of the folks who have used our materials and attended our boot camps
here:
http://www.ccbootcamp.com/halloffame.html

Other vendor's instructors, owners, employees, etc. have even used our
material to get their own CCIE certification. Our equipment is top notch.

Good to know Cisco has gotten ride of the bugs like the one below! lol

thanks,
Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
CCSI#30482
Network Learning Inc - A Cisco Sponsored Organization (SO) YES! We take
Cisco Learning credits!
mailto:brad@ccbootcamp.com
http://www.ccbootcamp.com (Cisco Training and Rental Racks)
http://www.ccbootcamp.com/groupstudy.html (groupstudy member discounts!)
Voice: 702-968-5100
FAX: 702-446-8012
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Dennis" <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
To: "jennytan" <jennytan@isolvesystems.com>
Cc: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: chap auth over frame relay

Actually there wouldn9t be a 3longer discussion2 if you know how to answer
the question yourself ;-) Just go to each vendor9s website and execute the
command below. Then compare the output from each vendor. It should help
answer your question ;-)

www.internetworkexpert.com>show ccie numbers | include recent R&S

#17439
#17409
#17403
#17401
#17381
#17372
#17359
#17354
#17353
#17328
#17315
#17297
#17286
#17254
#17241
#17238
#17234
#17228
#17219
#17197
#17186
#17184
#17168
#17162
#17147
#17142
#17124
#17100
#17094
#17089
#17085
#17082
#17040
#17038
#17030
#17019
#17018
#17010
#16999
#16996
#16995
#16993
#16992
#16986
#16966
#16963
#16954
#16940
#16924
#16921
#16899
#16886
#16876
#16859
#16856
#16842
#16839
#16828
#16827
#16815
#16814
#16808
#16803
#16802
#16791
#16790
#16780
#16779
#16778
#16777
#16768
#16762
#16753
#16713
#16678
#16639
#16624
#16616
#16602
#16570
#16543
#16523
#16508
#16499
#16479
#16471
#16464
#16461
#16454
#16407
#16399
#16394
#16366
#16365
#16364
#16359
#16350
#16343
#16320
#16300
#16294
#16287
#16264
#16262
#16224
#16162
#16147
#16141
#16121
#16041
#16027
#16024
#16022

www.internetworkexpert.com>

--

Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP) bdennis@internetworkexpert.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.InternetworkExpert.com Toll Free: 877-224-8987 Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)

On 2/19/07 2:49 PM, "jennytan" <jennytan@isolvesystems.com> wrote:

> Y'all are very funny and creative. I was going to start another thread. > I > bet there will be longer discussion if I asked you to compare the > pros/cons > and like/dislike of IPexpert, Internetworkexpert, CCBootcamp, NetMasterClass. > > I am working on IPexpert workbook now and have budget for bootcamp.... > > Thanks. > > On 2/19/07, Lou Ioanni < louisccie_r_s@yahoo.com > <mailto:louisccie_r_s@yahoo.com> > wrote: >> I tried it on my lab and is the other way around: >> >> RackR2W1(config)#username R4 password internetworkexpert >> ^ >> % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. >> >> RackR2W1(config)#username R4 password ipexpert >> RackR2W1(config)# >> >> :-) :-) >> >> Loizos Y. >> CCIE#10702 R & S >> >> >> >> Brian McGahan <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com> wrote: >> I think it is a password error, the CLI keeps rejecting it: >> >> Rack1R2(config)#username R4 password ipexpert >> ^ >> % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. >> >> Rack1R2(config)#username R4 password internetworkexpert >> Rack1R2(config)# >> >> ;) >> >> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP) >> bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com >> >> Internetwork Expert, Inc. >> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com >> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705 >> Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705 >> 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com >> Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/ >> <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Brian Dennis >> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 5:54 PM >> To: Lou Ioanni; jennytan; ccielab@groupstudy.com >> Subject: Re: chap auth over frame relay >> >> I would be surprised if anyone did not take it as a joke. Also the CCIE >> numbers from each site for the last 6 or 7 months show that the password >> "internetworkexpert" is used almost two to one ;-) So I stand by my >> statement ;-) >> >> -- >> >> Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP) >> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com >> >> Internetwork Expert, Inc. >> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com >> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 >> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada) >> >> >> On 2/18/07 3:25 PM, "Lou Ioanni" wrote: >> >>> > Jenny, don't let this confuse you. There is nothing wrong with your >> password >>> > "ipexpert". That is the most common password in practice labs. No >> reason to >>> > use long password in a practice lab. >>> > >>> > Brian Dennis wrote: You don't need >> the local >>> > router's username locally configured. You need the >>> > username of the remote device locally configured. CHAP basically uses >> the >>> > concept of a shared secret. Meaning that you are configuring a shared >>> > secret (aka password) to use with a particular remote device. On R2 >> you say >>> > "username R4 password cisco". This is telling the router that if we >> are >>> > doing CHAP with a remote device named R4 we will use the shared secret >> of >>> > "cisco". >>> > >>> > Also your password is wrong. It should be "internetworkexpert" and not >>> > "ipexpert" ;-) >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. >> Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:47 ART