From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Feb 19 2007 - 21:47:25 ART
Marvin,
If you look at the command you'll see that the method I showed was for
recent R&S CCIEs. Also it won't matter what method you use because you'll
always end up about 50% lower ;-)
--Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP) bdennis@internetworkexpert.com Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.InternetworkExpert.com Toll Free: 877-224-8987 Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
On 2/19/07 4:00 PM, "Marvin Greenlee" <marvin@ipexpert.com> wrote:
> So, by your "method", someone who had a lower CCIE number (under 16k), but > recently achieved a second (or third) CCIE using materials from a vendor > (like IPexpert) doesn't count as a "success story" for that vendor, because > their number is lower? > > Marvin Greenlee, CCIE #12237 (R&S, SP, Sec) > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > "When Will You Be an IP Expert?" > marvin@ipexpert.com > http://www.IPexpert.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > Brian Dennis > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 6:21 PM > To: jennytan > Cc: Brian McGahan; ccielab@groupstudy.com > Subject: Re: chap auth over frame relay > > Actually there wouldn9t be a 3longer discussion2 if you know how to answer > the question yourself ;-) Just go to each vendor9s website and execute the > command below. Then compare the output from each vendor. It should help > answer your question ;-) > > www.someothervendor.com>show ccie numbers | include recent R&S > > #17439 > #17409 > #17403 > #17401 > #17381 > #17372
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:47 ART