From: Eli Kosharovsky (eli_kosh@netvision.net.il)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2007 - 11:04:21 ART
Thanks,
That makes things cleared
Eli
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Morris
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 3:29 PM
To: 'Eli Kosharovsky'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IpExpert Phrasing
It means use "passive interface".
Just watch for requirements that need your routes to show up in a particular
way (e.g. redistributed versus network command).
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Eli
Kosharovsky
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 7:59 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IpExpert Phrasing
Dear GS,
I am doing the Ipexpert WB, and there is one thing what I have hard time
understanding:
Quote:
"Do not actively run routing protocols on any interface if it is not
necessary"
Does that mean:
If it is not necessary to run routing protocol on an interface - does it
have to be redistributed ?
Or Can I use network statement but place the interface in passive state -
can it be reffered to as not activly running routing protocol on the
interface ?
If I am told to place a loopback in a certain area in OSPF, do I need to
make the loopback passive ?
Mostly to satisfy the full IP connectivity requirement I feel more
comfortable with [network statement & passive interface] combination is that
ok for the real lab ? Or redistribution is the better way to go. I know that
if the labs doesn't restrict you in any way it's a free game, but what is
the preferred way in your opinion ?
Thanks in advance,
Eli.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:57 ART