From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2007 - 10:36:03 ART
I think what this is referring to is to be as specific as possible. For
instance, if you have only one interface in the EIGRP 100 domain,
172.16.25.3/24, then you would want to configure EIGRP like this...
router eigrp 100
network 172.16.25.0 0.0.0.255
or even like this...
router eigrp 100
network 172.16.25.3 0.0.0.0
as opposed to like this...
router eigrp 100
network 172.16.0.0
That way you aren't unnecessarily running EIGRP on other interfaces that
belong to the same major network.
On 1/22/07, Eli Kosharovsky <eli_kosh@netvision.net.il> wrote:
>
> Dear GS,
>
> I am doing the Ipexpert WB, and there is one thing what I have hard time
> understanding:
>
> Quote:
> "Do not actively run routing protocols on any interface if it is not
> necessary"
>
> Does that mean:
>
> If it is not necessary to run routing protocol on an interface - does it
> have to be redistributed ?
> Or Can I use network statement but place the interface in passive state -
> can it be reffered to as not activly running routing protocol on the
> interface ?
> If I am told to place a loopback in a certain area in OSPF, do I need to
> make the loopback passive ?
>
> Mostly to satisfy the full IP connectivity requirement I feel more
> comfortable with [network statement & passive interface] combination is
> that
> ok for the real lab ? Or redistribution is the better way to go. I know
> that
> if the labs doesn't restrict you in any way it's a free game, but what is
> the preferred way in your opinion ?
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Eli.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:57 ART