From: Angelo De Guzman (a.deguzman@wesolv.ph.fujitsu.com)
Date: Tue Jan 02 2007 - 00:31:00 ART
If the task says you cant configure the priority on the interface then this
could be another way of doing it.
Ronnie Angello (1/2/2007 11:15 AM):
>The default is 0, but you must configure the neighbor's interface with
>priority 0 to keep the router from participating in DR election. I'm with
>you...what's the use of configuring the priority with the neighbor command
>if you have to configure it on the interface anyway?
>
>On 1/1/07, Bit Gossip <bit.gossip@chello.nl> wrote:
>>
>> I am very confused on the matter after the following lab setup:
>>
>> interface Serial0/0
>> ip address 192.168.192.6 255.255.255.0
>> ip ospf network non-broadcast
>> ...
>> router ospf 6
>> neighbor 192.168.192.3
>> ...
>>
>> According to doc, default priority for the neighbor statement is 0 so
>> 192.168.192.3 should have priority 0; instead:
>>
>> r6#show ip ospf neighbor 192.168.118.3
>> Neighbor 192.168.118.3, interface address 192.168.192.3
>> In the area 0 via interface Serial0/0
>> Neighbor priority is 1 (configured 0), State is FULL, 18 state
>>
>> Where is this priority 1 coming from? Maybe the default priority applied
>> at the interface of 192.168.192.3?
>>
>> But this is not logical because the neighbor statement, being more
>> specific should prevail over the interface priority....
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Luca.
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:55 ART