From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jan 02 2007 - 00:15:17 ART
The default is 0, but you must configure the neighbor's interface with
priority 0 to keep the router from participating in DR election. I'm with
you...what's the use of configuring the priority with the neighbor command
if you have to configure it on the interface anyway?
On 1/1/07, Bit Gossip <bit.gossip@chello.nl> wrote:
>
> I am very confused on the matter after the following lab setup:
>
> interface Serial0/0
> ip address 192.168.192.6 255.255.255.0
> ip ospf network non-broadcast
> ...
> router ospf 6
> neighbor 192.168.192.3
> ...
>
> According to doc, default priority for the neighbor statement is 0 so
> 192.168.192.3 should have priority 0; instead:
>
> r6#show ip ospf neighbor 192.168.118.3
> Neighbor 192.168.118.3, interface address 192.168.192.3
> In the area 0 via interface Serial0/0
> Neighbor priority is 1 (configured 0), State is FULL, 18 state
>
> Where is this priority 1 coming from? Maybe the default priority applied
> at the interface of 192.168.192.3?
>
> But this is not logical because the neighbor statement, being more
> specific should prevail over the interface priority....
>
> Thanks,
> Luca.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:55 ART