From: Keith Bizzell (mkbcoolman@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Dec 16 2006 - 08:11:39 ART
Looking into Scott's reply on the second link, that's exactly what I'm
seeing. Now I don't feel so dumb. :)
On 12/16/06, Keith Bizzell <mkbcoolman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Kemal!
>
> On 12/16/06, Kemal YILDIRIM <kemalhy@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Keith,
> > This has been discussed some time ago, There were different apporaches
> > by
> > different gurus.
> > Have a look at the below links
> >
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200604/msg00083.html
> >
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200608/msg01252.html
> >
> >
> > HTH,
> > Kemal
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto: nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Keith Bizzell
> > Sent: 16 Aral}k 2006 Cumartesi 11:56
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: IE Core 3 section 4.5 OSPF virtual link
> >
> > I'm seeing something strange with the virtual link. I can get it to
> > work, I
> > just cant explain why. The is no Area 0 defined in the topology, and
> > the
> > lab requires you to build a virtual-link between R3 and R1. I build
> > this
> > out on using the loopback addresses, but it will not work until I assign
> > the
> > loopback of R3 to area 0. After the virtual link is establised, I can
> > remove the loopback from Area 0, and everything still works
> > fine. Why? I'm
> > uncomfortable with this solution on a lab, since I don't think this
> > configuration would work on a reboot.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Keith
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:38 ART