matching on interface or access-list

From: Cisco Key (ciscokey@googlemail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 22 2006 - 18:57:30 ART

• Next message: Michael Zuo: "RE: Backup for RP in multicasting"
• Previous message: Andrew Bruce Caslow: "RE: was in Brussels yesterday..."
• Next in thread: Nambi Appachigounder: "Re: matching on interface or access-list"
• Maybe reply: Nambi Appachigounder: "Re: matching on interface or access-list"
• Maybe reply: Ivan: "Re: matching on interface or access-list"
• Maybe reply: Sergio Silva: "Re: matching on interface or access-list"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi All

Please can you shed some light on this for me

If I configure the following:

ip access-list standard Connected_OSPF
permit 172.16.168.0
permit 172.16.169.0
permit 172.16.170.0

route-map Connected_OSPF permit 10
match ip address Connected_OSPF

or

route-map connected_loopbacks permit 10
 match ip address Loopback168 Loopback169 Loopback170

Whats the difference? I say non!

I prefer to do less lines in my configuration but is there a diffrence?

But is there a problem me doing less?

Thanks in advance
Paul

• Next message: Michael Zuo: "RE: Backup for RP in multicasting"
• Previous message: Andrew Bruce Caslow: "RE: was in Brussels yesterday..."
• Next in thread: Nambi Appachigounder: "Re: matching on interface or access-list"
• Maybe reply: Nambi Appachigounder: "Re: matching on interface or access-list"
• Maybe reply: Ivan: "Re: matching on interface or access-list"
• Maybe reply: Sergio Silva: "Re: matching on interface or access-list"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:48 ART