From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sun Nov 19 2006 - 19:27:20 ART
The diagram illustrates the logical topology. Suppose the diagram
showed R1 and R2's Ethernet interfaces in VLAN 10. This doesn't
necessarily mean that they are physically connected together, just that
they are in the same logical segment per VLAN assignment.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP)
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Holko [mailto:ben.holko@globalcenter.net.au]
> Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 3:44 PM
> To: Brian McGahan
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: RE: IE dynagen topology - something wrong?
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> That makes sense - but why does the network diagram show R5 e0/0
> connected to sw2 Fa0/15?
>
> Ben
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian McGahan [mailto:bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com]
> Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 5:03 AM
> To: Ben Holko
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: RE: IE dynagen topology - something wrong?
>
> Ben,
>
> You are mixing up the logical topology and the physical
> topology. R5's E0/0 connects to SW1's Fa0/5 (Fa1/5 on Dynamips).
SW2's
> Fa0/15 connects to SW1's Fa0/15. Based on this how can you configure
> R5's E0/0 and SW2's Fa0/15 in the same broadcast domain?
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP)
> bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > Ben Holko
> > Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 2:09 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: IE dynagen topology - something wrong?
> >
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > I have version 3.05
> >
> > Ben
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: Brian Dennis [mailto:bdennis@internetworkexpert.com]
> > Sent: Sun 11/19/2006 3:34 PM
> > To: Ben Holko; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: IE dynagen topology - something wrong?
> >
> >
> >
> > I believe that the dynagen topology that Brian McGahan posted was
for
> > version 3 of the workbook. The sample lab you downloaded my have
been
>
> > version 4.
> >
> > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> >
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
<http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > Ben Holko
> > Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:15 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: IE dynagen topology - something wrong?
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm working through the IE sample lab, and the diagram shows R5 e0/0
> > connected to sw2 Fa0/15, but the dynagen config has R5 connected to
> sw1
> > port 5 and sw2 port 5
> >
> >
> >
> > am i missing something here?
> >
> >
> >
> > Ben
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:47 ART