From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Nov 13 2006 - 23:51:36 ART
Actually it's minCIR and not CIR when using legacy FRTS. See below:
class-map match-all MY_CLASS
match any
!
policy-map MY_MAP
class MY_CLASS
bandwidth percent 100
!
interface Serial0/0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay traffic-shaping
frame-relay interface-dlci 102
class FR_MAP
!
map-class frame-relay FR_MAP
frame-relay cir 512000
service-policy output MY_MAP
!
R1(config-map-class)#do sho policy-map int s0/0 | include Band
Bandwidth 100 (%)
Bandwidth 256 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
R1(config-map-class)#
R1(config-map-class)#frame-relay cir 256000
R1(config-map-class)#
R1(config-map-class)#do sho policy-map int s0/0 | include Band
Bandwidth 100 (%)
Bandwidth 128 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
R1(config-map-class)#
Also you can find this documented on CCO (somewhere ;-)
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Michael Zuo
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 5:28 PM
To: Alexey Tolstenok; david robin
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: RE: frame relay rtp priority and priority command ( IWEB LAB 13 task 8.5)
I agree...
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Alexey Tolstenok
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 6:02 AM
To: david robin
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: frame relay rtp priority and priority command ( IWEB LAB 13
task 8.5)
I think CBWFQ bandwith limit calculation here is based on "bandwidth"
command of the main interface or its default value (but not on
frame-relay
cir)
Any other opinions?
-- SY, Alexey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:46 ART