From: Vishal Patel (vpatel@accessproviders.com.au)
Date: Tue Nov 14 2006 - 00:01:29 ART
well , the way you configure will effect the switching types.
if i use " rate-limit xxxxxxx " then packets will be process switched.
and If i use MQC with policing , then CEF switching can be used.
I have done this on a 7500 router , not sure about other platforms.
_____
From: Adhu Ajit [mailto:adhu_ajit@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2006 12:20 PM
To: Vishal Patel; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Rate Limit vs Police
Vishal, thanks for your answer.
But my real question was:
"Folks, as I understand both do the same thing, just that there are 2
different ways.
Does it matter which one I choose for a particular implementation ? Does
Cisco prefer one over the other for different situations ?"
Thank you.
Vishal Patel <vpatel@accessproviders.com.au> wrote:
Rate limit is policing..
It will drop the packets after the rate limit is reached.
Traffic shaping is delaying...the packets will be delayed after a
particular limit is reached.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Adhu
Ajit
Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2006 10:34 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Rate Limit vs Police
Folks, as I understand both do the same thing, just that there are 2
different ways.
Does it matter which one I choose for a particular implementation ? Does
Cisco prefer one over the other for different situations ?
Any comments will be much appreciated.
Thank you.
---------------------------------
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:46 ART