From: JB (jellyboy@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Nov 09 2006 - 18:45:48 ART
Thanks, for the reply. Would my answer be specific enough to pass that
question in the exam? <Obviously I will be looking out for the KISS in
future!!>
Cheers,
JB
On 11/9/06, Bajo <bajoalex@gmail.com> wrote:
> JB,
>
> Yours solution could be OK but not future-proof:)...U've no control on what
> PVC/traffic type the BBs send u. So, if no specific traffic type is
> mentioned, I will keep it simple (aka KISS) and use class-default.
>
> Just my .02
>
>
> On 11/9/06, JB <jellyboy@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, the question is regarding IEWB Lab9 8.1, but it is a general
> > question anyway. I always seem to have trouble on developing a
> > solution to matching traffic for a MQC. In this particular example all
> > traffic from a router to the backbone needs to be shaped. The solution
> > puts everything into a class-default and matched all traffic out to
> > the backbome to be shaped. I did a match on the DLCI:
> >
> > class-map match-all FRAME_SHAPING
> > match fr-dlci 51
> >
> > policy-map FRAME_SHAPING
> > class FRAME_SHAPING
> > shape average 5000000 160000 80000
> >
> > The outputs from the Rack1R6#sh policy-map interface s0/0 command are
> > identical via either the class-default or the match fr-dlci and to my
> > untrained eye I assume they do the same. I just want to know is it my
> > matching on the DLCI also correct? If not, could someone please
> > explain?
> >
> > TIA JB
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bajo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:45 ART