From: Alexei Monastyrnyi (alexeim@orcsoftware.com)
Date: Thu Nov 09 2006 - 20:00:17 ART
matching DLCI is not scalable IMO.... though it seems to do the same
work in this case.
A.
JB wrote:
> Hi, the question is regarding IEWB Lab9 8.1, but it is a general
> question anyway. I always seem to have trouble on developing a
> solution to matching traffic for a MQC. In this particular example all
> traffic from a router to the backbone needs to be shaped. The solution
> puts everything into a class-default and matched all traffic out to
> the backbome to be shaped. I did a match on the DLCI:
>
> class-map match-all FRAME_SHAPING
> match fr-dlci 51
>
> policy-map FRAME_SHAPING
> class FRAME_SHAPING
> shape average 5000000 160000 80000
>
> The outputs from the Rack1R6#sh policy-map interface s0/0 command are
> identical via either the class-default or the match fr-dlci and to my
> untrained eye I assume they do the same. I just want to know is it my
> matching on the DLCI also correct? If not, could someone please
> explain?
>
> TIA JB
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:45 ART