From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sun Nov 05 2006 - 00:54:21 ART
While we won't want to anticipate needing to request a regrade, I cannot
imagine that the solution required by a lab exam would go to that extreme.
That being said, it at least is an interesting exercise. And as long as you
aren't prohibited from adding something into area 0 (new interface?
Loopback?) then go ahead and do so.
I wouldn't recommend thinking in that fashion for the lab. What happens in
the event of a power blip before grading? Just my thoughts. :)
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Brian Dennis
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 10:44 PM
To: Richard Dumoulin; Alexey Tolstenok
Cc: Group study
Subject: RE: RE : RE : IE Core WB Lab 3 Task 4.5
You could also try running different OSPF processes. Remember that in the
lab they will not reboot your routers before they grade your lab. That
being said your solution should survive a reload in the event you request a
regrade ;-)
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
________________________________
From: Richard Dumoulin [mailto:Richard.Dumoulin@vanco.fr]
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 7:35 PM
To: Brian Dennis; Alexey Tolstenok
Cc: Group study
Subject: RE : RE : IE Core WB Lab 3 Task 4.5
Ok, so that was the trick. It did not survive a reboot of R2 or R1 though :D
-- Richard
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Brian Dennis [mailto:bdennis@internetworkexpert.com]
Envoyi : Sunday, November 05, 2006 4:08 AM @ : Richard Dumoulin; Alexey
Tolstenok Cc : Group study Objet : RE: RE : IE Core WB Lab 3 Task 4.5
Have you tried to add an interface into area 0 to get the virtual-link
up and then remove the interface from area 0 once it's up?
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Richard Dumoulin
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 6:42 PM
To: Alexey Tolstenok
Cc: Group study
Subject: RE : IE Core WB Lab 3 Task 4.5
It is not working for me either and I am using c3660-jk9o3s-mz.124-10a.
Alexey, I would not worry too much about this scenario...
-- Richard
-----Message d'origine-----
De : nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] De la part de
Alexey Tolstenok
Envoyi : Saturday, November 04, 2006 11:32 AM
@ : Brian Dennis
Cc : Group study
Objet : Re: IE Core WB Lab 3 Task 4.5
I've tried this scenario and still have no idea how to accomplish this
state. First I define area 12 betw. R1, R2 then virtual-link between R1
and
R2 and after that area 13 on R2, R3
But virtual-link isn't even try to come up. What I'm doing wrong?
2006/11/4, Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>:
>
> Here is an example of an OSPF network with only two non-zero areas
> working using a virtual-link. The configuration is: R1 <-Ethernet->
R2
> <-Serial-> R3. Area 12 is between R1 and R2. Area 13 is between R2
and
> R3. There is a virtual-link between R1 and R2 across area 12.
>
> If you try to build this network yourself be sure to create the first
> OSPF area then the virtual link before adding on the second OSPF area.
>
>
--SY, Alexey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:45 ART