From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Wed Oct 04 2006 - 17:00:12 ART
Tony,
You can police your traffic outbound but typically in practical
implementations you'd find that it makes more sense to shape your
traffic. Why drop your own outbound traffic when you have the
possibility to send it a few milliseconds or seconds later? Within the
case of the lab I would talk to the proctor if you are confused about
semantics like this.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Tony Paterra
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 2:28 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: IEWB Lab 18 Task 8.1...
>
> All,
> Task 8.1 asks us to make sure R5 conforms to a provisioned rate (2.5
> Mbps for one subint, and 3.5Mbps for another subint of an Ethernet
> interface. The solution has a policy-map using traffic shaping
> instead of policing.
>
> It says "the upstream neighbor will only allow 2.5 Mbps" etc... As
> long as your exceed action is to drop, can't policing be used here as
> well?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Tony Paterra
> apaterra@gmail.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:04 ART