From: Noble, TN (noble.ccie@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 04 2006 - 16:47:59 ART
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/policevsshape.html
Have a look at this document. May help you.
Thank you,
-Noble
On 10/5/06, Tony Paterra <apaterra@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
> Task 8.1 asks us to make sure R5 conforms to a provisioned rate (2.5
> Mbps for one subint, and 3.5Mbps for another subint of an Ethernet
> interface. The solution has a policy-map using traffic shaping
> instead of policing.
>
> It says "the upstream neighbor will only allow 2.5 Mbps" etc... As
> long as your exceed action is to drop, can't policing be used here as
> well?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Tony Paterra
> apaterra@gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Thank you,-Noble
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:04 ART