From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Fri Sep 01 2006 - 19:59:10 ART
Don't try to outthink the question. PIMv2 = BSR. People who outthink questions get a lot of $1250 lunches at Cisco ;-)
The CCIE lab is one of the few places where being smart can be a liability and not an asset. This is because smart people are more likely to outthink a question, whereas "not so smart" people just answer the question in a straight forward manner because they can't outthink the question.
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Ryan
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 3:42 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: PIMv2
If PIMv2 is ever mentioned in a task, should we use BSR or auto-rp?
From the doc cd, it does reference BSR with v2. i.e. "PIM uses the BSR to discover and announce RP-set information for each group prefix to all the routers in a PIM domain. This is the same function performed by Auto-RP, but the BSR is part of the PIM Version 2 specification."
Yet if you look at using auto-rp it will automatically default to pimv2 if all of the other routers agree as such i.e. cisco routers.
Your thoughts?
Thanks in advance,
Jeff
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:39 ART