PIMv2

From: Jeff Ryan (jeffryanwn@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 01 2006 - 19:41:58 ART

Next message: srdja blagojevic: "RE: Mock lab 1 : TASK 1.3 (Router on a stick)"
Previous message: ismail el-shalh: "Mock lab 1 : TASK 1.3 (Router on a stick)"
Next in thread: Brian Dennis: "RE: PIMv2"
Maybe reply: Brian Dennis: "RE: PIMv2"
Maybe reply: sabrina pittarel: "Re: PIMv2"
Maybe reply: Narbik Kocharians: "Re: PIMv2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

If PIMv2 is ever mentioned in a task, should we use BSR or auto-rp?

From the doc cd, it does reference BSR with v2. i.e. "PIM uses the BSR to
discover and announce RP-set information for each group prefix to all the
routers in a PIM domain. This is the same function performed by Auto-RP, but
the BSR is part of the PIM Version 2 specification."

Yet if you look at using auto-rp it will automatically default to pimv2 if
all of the other routers agree as such i.e. cisco routers.

Your thoughts?

Thanks in advance,
Jeff

Next message: srdja blagojevic: "RE: Mock lab 1 : TASK 1.3 (Router on a stick)"
Previous message: ismail el-shalh: "Mock lab 1 : TASK 1.3 (Router on a stick)"
Next in thread: Brian Dennis: "RE: PIMv2"
Maybe reply: Brian Dennis: "RE: PIMv2"
Maybe reply: sabrina pittarel: "Re: PIMv2"
Maybe reply: Narbik Kocharians: "Re: PIMv2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:39 ART