From: Ivan (ivan@iip.net)
Date: Mon Aug 21 2006 - 13:00:54 ART
1) agree
2) Your configuration seems act like in example.
ip access-list standard filtering-RP
permit 50.0.0.2
deny any
permit 50.0.0.2 - means that R2 should subjected by filter.
deny any - any other routers must "blindly" accept by MA, the same as deny R4
in this case.
ACL filternig-group strange for me.
ip access-list standard filtering-group
permit 224.1.0.1
permit 224.1.0.2
permit 224.1.0.3
It permit all example-groups.
Therefore MA filter R2 all group except 224.1.0.(1|2|3) and "blindly" accept
all group from R4 (in example) and from any (in your case).
If we want to reach the task we can simple delete ACL filtering-group. And
ip access-list standard filtering-RP
permit 50.0.0.4
deny any
> Hi Guys,
>
> I was playing around with the configuration showed in this link
> <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk828/technologies_configuration_example09
>1 86a00801cb923.shtml>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk828/technologies_configuration_example091
>8 6a00801cb923.shtml
>
> I have a couple of questions to do
>
> 1.- First R3 is missing the ip pim send-rp-discovery command right??
> 2.- if I work with the ip pim rp-announce-filter rp-list filtering-RP
> group-list filtering-group
>
> But instead of denying R4, I deny everything
> Something like:
>
> ip access-list standard filtering-RP
> permit 50.0.0.2
> deny any
>
> It seem to not be working
>
> Any opinion about this
> Thanks
> Victor.-
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
-- Ivan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:58 ART