Re: NTP Access-List

From: WorkerBee (ciscobee@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 14 2006 - 03:03:28 ART


Yeah, you need to include 127.127.7.1 in the allowed list as well.

On 8/12/06, Colm O'Leary <Colm.O'Leary@anpost.ie> wrote:
> Group,
> When configuring an ntp access-list on an NTP server which derives
> its own time from its hardware clock, does the access-list need to
> include 127.127.7.1. I am noticing some funnies in my lab when I have an
> access-list and do not include 127.127.7.1. If I put a deny any log at
> the end of the ACL it logs an entry from 0.0.0.0 to 127.127.7.1, and
> eventually the clock becomes unsynced locally.
>
> Has anybody experienced similar behavior.
>
> Regards,
>
> Colm
>
> *****************************************************************************
> ****
> This e-mail and its attachments, is confidential and is intended for the
> addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, disclosure,
> distribution or any action taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be
> unlawful. Please note that any information expressed in this message or its
> attachments is not given or endorsed by An Post unless otherwise indicated by
> an authorised representative independently of this message. An Post does not
> accept responsibility for the contents of this message and although it has
> been scanned for viruses An Post will not accept responsibility for any damage
> caused as a result of a virus being passed on.
> *****************************************************************************
> ****
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:57 ART