Re: per-port per-vlan classification

From: lenny lim (lennylsl@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Aug 03 2006 - 09:35:54 ART

• Next message: ZeroFlash: "RE: Articulating the need for a router"
• Previous message: tony hall: "Re: per-port per-vlan classification"
• Maybe in reply to: nikolai: "Re: per-port per-vlan classification"
• Next in thread: nikolai: "Re: per-port per-vlan classification"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

For Per-port Per VLAN, you have to use "match-all".

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps646/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080115928.html#xtocid32

tony hall <tony_hall123@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: Hi Lenn,
Does it matter if we match all or any in first Class-map

class-map match-all ANY
   match access-group 1

Tony.

• Next message: ZeroFlash: "RE: Articulating the need for a router"
• Previous message: tony hall: "Re: per-port per-vlan classification"
• Maybe in reply to: nikolai: "Re: per-port per-vlan classification"
• Next in thread: nikolai: "Re: per-port per-vlan classification"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:55 ART