From: ZeroFlash (Fire_Ice@verizon.net)
Date: Thu Aug 03 2006 - 09:40:21 ART
Nothing rude dude, but what's the point? What's the reason for it? For 10-20
users your not going to have tons of subnets, if you want a router between
the firewall and switch add a L3 switch rather than a firewall.
I've never heard of putting a router behind a firewall then to a switch for
10-20 users, if you really want to then you would need a 3550 switch or 3560
series switch. Then you are looking about 2k - 3k for the switch.
These are just my thoughts
ZeroFlash
CCIE #16217
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Cacca Mucca
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:39 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Articulating the need for a router
> One of my remote site has the following design:
>
> Serial T1 Ethernet Ethernet
> ISP -------------------- Router ----------------- FW ------------------
> Switch ----------- Internal Devices
>
>
>
> I want to introduce another router in between the FW and the Switch but
> meeting resistance from the FW group. It is the control thing.
>
> Serial T1 Ethernet Ethernet
> ISP -------------------- Router ----------------- FW ------------------
> Router -------------Switch ----------- Internal Devices
>
>
> Besides good network design and Cisco's IOS tools at my disposal for
> troubleshooting, how do I sell this?
>
> My supervisors are having problems with my idea for a remote site with
> only 10 to 20 end users.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:55 ART