frame relay encapsulation type

From: Quetta Walla (quetta_1@lycos.com)
Date: Tue Jul 18 2006 - 05:47:19 ART

• Next message: Hafizur Rahman \(UK\): "RE: RIP protocol small but confusing"
• Previous message: WorkerBee: "Re: RIP protocol small but confusing"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

The Scenario here is that R1 is HUB and R2 & R3 are Spokes
If we look at configurations below, the encapsulation type on R2
(spoke) is Frame-relay IETF. The interface encapsulation on FR
switch is set to FR-IETF for interface connected to R2. So when we
do our configuration on R1 and R3. Should we use IETF on the static
mapping towards R2 or should we leave it like the way it is in the
configuration. Can some one kindly help me out through this.

I shall be grateful

R1 HUB

Interface s0/0
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no frame-relay inverse arp
frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.2 102 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.3 103 broadcast

R2 Spoke

Interface s0/0
ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
no frame-relay inverse arp
frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.1 201 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.3 201

R3 Spoke

Interface s0/0
ip address 10.0.0.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no frame-relay inverse arp
frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.1 301 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.2 301

-- 

• Next message: Hafizur Rahman \(UK\): "RE: RIP protocol small but confusing"
• Previous message: WorkerBee: "Re: RIP protocol small but confusing"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:47 ART