From: Elias Chari (elias.chari@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jul 03 2006 - 19:47:25 ART
Would this not be the hold-queue command?
On 7/3/06, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, you are correct. And hardware in the lab doesn't either. :)
> Sometimes lab writers get a little overzealous with things, but on the
> other
> hand, it's good that you could look through the docs and determine this
> was
> the command you were looking for!!!
>
> The Proctor Guide points this discrepancy out as well.
>
> HTH,
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI
> IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Montgomery, Jerry
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 6:05 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: IPEXPERT LAB 12 Task 8
>
> Good afternoon, all,
>
> The questions was to configure WFQ on a serial interface and set the
> maximu
> number of packets that can be in all output queues on the interface at any
> time to 800.
>
>
> The command that I was envisioning to use was "fair-queue
> aggregate-limit".
> However, this is associated with Distributed Weighted Fair Queue.
>
> I am assuming that my hardwared just does not support this command.
>
> Am I correct, or am I missing another command?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jerry
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:46 ART