RE: IPEXPERT LAB 12 Task 8

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Jul 03 2006 - 21:15:18 ART


The hold-queue is a per-interface (hold-queue) or per-pvc (frame-relay
hold-queue) setup. I believe the wording on the task made it out to be for
the entire router. It's been a while since I've looked at it, but on a
per-pvc/interface basis you would be correct.
 
HTH,
 
 
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
 
 
PS. A decent document with different stuff about queuing on an interface
is:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk544/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
0a4754.shtml

 
  _____

From: Elias Chari [mailto:elias.chari@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 6:47 PM
To: Scott Morris
Cc: Montgomery, Jerry; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IPEXPERT LAB 12 Task 8

Would this not be the hold-queue command?

On 7/3/06, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:

Yeah, you are correct. And hardware in the lab doesn't either. :)
Sometimes lab writers get a little overzealous with things, but on the other

hand, it's good that you could look through the docs and determine this was
the command you were looking for!!!

The Proctor Guide points this discrepancy out as well.

HTH,

Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Montgomery, Jerry
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 6:05 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPEXPERT LAB 12 Task 8

Good afternoon, all,

The questions was to configure WFQ on a serial interface and set the maximu
number of packets that can be in all output queues on the interface at any
time to 800.

The command that I was envisioning to use was "fair-queue aggregate-limit".
However, this is associated with Distributed Weighted Fair Queue.

I am assuming that my hardwared just does not support this command.

Am I correct, or am I missing another command?

Thanks,

Jerry



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:46 ART