From: Godswill Oletu (oletu@inbox.lv)
Date: Mon May 22 2006 - 14:21:09 ART
> Access-list 1 permit ip 172.16.24.141
> Access-list 1 permit ip 172.16.24.142
>
> Class-map Silver
> Match access-group 1
>
> Policy-map Global
> Class Silver
> police 768000 5000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
>
The policing above is assigned to the Class Silver and not to each of the
access list statements. A maximum bandwidth of 768k has been assigned to
that class and it really does not matter who uses it and to what propotion.
During congestion, if traffic matching access list statement 1, were the
ones to arrive first, the class map, will match them and forward them to the
policer and the policer will allow them upto 768k. Let assume thoeritically
that access-list statement 1 have upto 768k of traffic and it got in line
first, the policer will give it all the attention; and if while those
traffics from statement 1 are being serviced, traffics from statement 2 were
match by the Class-map and forwarded to the policer, the policer will drop
those traffic because it will consider them as excess.
If you want to give both access list statements an equal and fair chance of
being transmitted in the event of a congestion, go ahead and create two
class maps and split the bandwidth between them.
HTH
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Frederick" <AFrederick@homefederalbank.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 12:44 PM
Subject: MQC ?
> Hi Group
>
>
>
> Have a question about policing w/ MQC. My scenario has a basic router
> (1 outside, 1 inside IP address). The IP range on the inside is all the
> same. However, I have 2 ACL's as below;
>
>
>
>
>
> Access-list 1 permit ip 172.16.24.141
>
> Access-list 1 permit ip 172.16.24.142
>
> Access-list 2 permit ip 172.16.24.143
>
>
>
> Class-map Silver
>
> Match access-group 1
>
>
>
> Class-map Gold
>
> Match access-group 2
>
>
>
>
>
> Policy-map Global
>
> Class Silver
>
> police 768000 5000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
>
>
>
> Class Gold
>
> Bandwidth 1000
>
>
>
> Interface Serial0/0/0
>
> Description Outside WAN Interface
>
> Service-policy output Global
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> My question.... Will the IPs in the ACL 1 "BOTH" be able to use 768000
> independently or will that value be shared among the IPs in the ACL
> (i.e. @ full capacity will each IP only be allowed 384000 or 768000)
>
>
>
> TIA
>
>
> Adam
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART